Roman,

a test case attached to a Jira issue. I don't see a reason why this does
not work. Can you as such please create an issue at

http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CASTOR

and attach a fully working test case. If you are using Maven, there's an
archetype available to assist you with this (as documented at
http://castor.org/maven-archetypes.html).

Regards
Werner

Roman Klaehne wrote:
> Hi Werner,
> 
>> that should work out of the box. 
> 
> This sounds good. I also thought that it should work.
> 
>> When you used the XML code generator to
>> generate the Java classes from your XML schema, it produced (so-called)
>> descriptor classes as well. Did you compile those as well, and are these
>> available on your classpath as well ?
> 
> Yes, the descriptor classes are generated and all generated classes are
> on the classpath.
> 
> As I said the following code works fine:
> 
> ***************************************************
> Unmarshaller u = new Unmarshaller(RootXml.class)
> Object o = u.unmarshal(reader)
> ***************************************************
> 
> But if I instantiate the Unmarshaller without a "root class" argument
> (using the empty constructor), the error message
> 
> "The class for the root element 'root' could not be found."
> 
> arises.
> 
> My XML-Schema also have a namespace. I don't know whether this is
> important. But my XML sources have a the same namespace of course.
> 
> What more information you need to analyze this matter?
> 
> 
> All the best
> /roman
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> Regards
>> Werner Guttmann
>>
>> Roman Klaehne wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>> I am using the Castor Source Code Generator together with Castor
>>> Unmarshaller.
>>>
>>> For the simple XML schema:
>>>
>>> *******************************************************************
>>> <xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema";
>>> elementFormDefault="qualified" attributeFormDefault="unqualified">
>>>  <xs:element name="root"/>
>>>  <xs:element name="element"/>
>>> </xs:schema>
>>> *******************************************************************
>>>
>>> I have such a binding file:
>>>
>>> **************************************************
>>> <binding defaultBindingType="type">
>>>   <elementBinding name="root">
>>>     <java-class name="RootXml"/>
>>>   </elementBinding>
>>>   <elementBinding name="element">
>>>     <java-class name="ElementXml"/>
>>>   </elementBinding>
>>> </binding>
>>> **************************************************
>>>
>>> After generating the source code for the schema using the binding file
>>> above I want to unmarshall XML sources to the repective Java classes.
>>>
>>> When doing
>>>
>>> ***************************************************
>>> Unmarshaller u = new Unmarshaller(RootXml.class)
>>> Object o = u.unmarshal(reader)
>>> ***************************************************
>>>
>>> the object o is correctly unmarshalled and is an instance of class
>>> RootXml (as it should be).
>>>
>>> But when using the default constructor of Unmarshaller (without giving
>>> the root class RootXml.class) I get the following error message:
>>>
>>> "The class for the root element 'root' could not be found."
>>>
>>> My intention is to have XML documents with root elements "<root>" or
>>> "<element>" and when calling Unmarshaller.unmarshal() I don't know the
>>> type of the XML source (root or element). That means I want to do the
>>> following:
>>>
>>> ****************************************
>>> Unmarshaller u = new Unmarshaller();
>>> Object o = u.unmarshal();
>>>
>>> if(o instanceof RootXml) {
>>>   doRoot();
>>> }
>>> else if(o instanceof ElementXml) {
>>>   doElement();
>>> }
>>> ****************************************
>>>
>>> Do you have any ideas to get this working?
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance and best regards
>>> /Roman Klähne
>>> (ZIB Berlin)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>>>
>>>     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>>>
>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>>
>>     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>>
>>
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
> 
>     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email


Reply via email to