Hi, You will need a class mapping for the class that has the Map property, and a field mapping for just this property. As long as you use the auto-complete attribute in the enclosing class mapping, that should be it.
Regards Werner darrickc wrote: > So, in order to get Map<String, Map<String, Object>> to marshal/unmarshal > I'll have to use a mapping file just for this object? > > > > Werner Guttmann wrote: >> Hi, >> >> darrickc wrote: >>> Or do I have to start using a mapping file if I want this sort of >>> Marshalling/Unmarshalling to work? >> Yes, but with the auto-complete feature in place, just map whatever is >> required and leave the rest to the introspector. >> >>> Up to this point I've just used >>> Introspection instead of a mapping file as I have relatively simple >>> objects >>> to marshal. Now I want to have a Map <String, Map<String, CustomObject>> >>> marshalled through Castor. I've tried to implement this with >>> introspection >>> but when I unmarshal I run into problems as it's complaining about not >>> being >>> able to cast from MapItem to java.util.Map. I would much prefer to >>> continue >>> using introspection as deploying a mapping file would really be a pain >>> for >>> me. >> Really ? Why ? >> >>> Any help would be greatly appreciated! >>> >>> Thanks in advance. >>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: >> >> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email >> >> >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
