Steve, I for myself am not 100% sure this is a bug. But in order to come up with an educated opinion, we need something to look at. Hence my request to raise a new ticket and provide us with something reproducible.
Regards Werner Steve Kingsland wrote: > Well first, I'm not really sure this is a problem. I just found this fixed > bug: > > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CASTOR-2231 > > which makes it sound like the "xmlns:java="http://java.sun.com"; > xsi:type="java:java.lang.String"" is being added on purpose, perhaps for > unmarshalling? It must have to do with the XML field being mapped to an > enum, I just can't figure out exactly why... > > -Steve > > On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 5:48 AM, Werner Guttmann > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Steve, >> >> can you please create a new Jira ticket at >> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CASTOR, and attach a fully working >> (JUnit preferably) test case that allows us to reproduce the problem. >> >> Thanks >> Werner >> >> Steve Kingsland wrote: >>> Sorry to dig up an old thread, but I think I'm having the same issue >>> as NMcLoughlin >>> was. My case is pretty simple though: when I marshall a Java5 enum, it >>> works, but I get extra namespace details added to the XML Element that I >>> don't want. I'm using Castor 1.3. >>> >>> My POJO contains a simple Java5 enum: >>> >>> public enum MyEnum {Yes, No} >>> >>> public MyEnum yesNo; >>> >>> My mapping maps the Java property to an XML Element: >>> >>> <field name="yesNo"> >>> <bind-xml name="myElement"> >>> </field> >>> >>> And when I marshall to XML, I'd expect to see this, right? >>> >>> <myElement>Yes</myElement> >>> >>> But what I'm getting is this: >>> >>> <myElement *xmlns:java="http://java.sun.com"; >> xsi:type="java:java.lang.** >>> String"*>Yes</myElement> >>> >>> Can anyone explain why that is? >>> >>> I haven't tried *unmarshalling*, because for the current project I'm >> working >>> on, I only need to marshall. >>> >>> -Steve >>> >>> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 4:52 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Sorry I should have been more clear. That is where the problem is. >> Object >>>> --> xml. I don't have a call for the other way, but can set one up. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Werner Guttmann >>>> <werner.guttmann@ >>>> gmx.net> >> To >>>> [email protected] >>>> 12/17/2008 03:39 >> cc >>>> PM >>>> >> Subject >>>> Re: [castor-user] Java 5 Enums and >>>> Please respond to xsi:type >>>> [email protected] >>>> aus.org >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> before looking into this, can I ask you to marshal some Object instance >>>> to XML to make sure whether that side of things work. >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> Werner Guttmann >>>> >>>> [email protected] wrote: >>>>> Yes, I'm using a mapping based approach. Just a simple enum: >>>>> >>>>> public enum Type { >>>>> >>>>> ABC, VDR, ICZ; >>>>> >>>>> } >>>>> >>>>> And here's the relevant part of my mapping: >>>>> >>>>> <field name="type" type="com.mycompany.Type"> >>>>> <bind-xml name="cv:type" node="element" >>>>> xmlns:cv="http://www.mycompany.com/Type"; /> >>>>> </field> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for your help. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Werner Guttmann >>>>> <werner.guttmann@ >>>>> gmx.net> >>>> To >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> 12/17/2008 03:15 >>>> cc >>>>> PM >>>> Subject >>>>> Re: [castor-user] Java 5 Enums >> and >>>>> Please respond to xsi:type >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> aus.org >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> yes, this could be an issue, as it all depends how you've developed >> your >>>>> enum to which this XML should be mapped (assuming that you are using a >>>>> mapping-based approach). >>>>> >>>>> How does your enum look like ? >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> Werner >>>>> >>>>> [email protected] wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I'm having an issue with marshalling java 5 enums. >>>>> >>>>> The generated xml has the following declaration: >>>>> xsi:type="java:java.lang.String", as in: >>>>> >>>>> <cv:type xsi:type="java:java.lang.String" >>>>> xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"; >>>>> xmlns:c="http://www.mycompany.com/Type";>ABC</cv:type> >>>>> >>>>> ... which obviously doesn't validate. How can this be prevented? >>>>> >>>>> I've seen this issue posted several times against previous versions of >>>>> Castor but with no solutions. I'm using Castor version 1.3rc1. Is this >>>>> still an issue? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks. >>>> ----------------------------------------- >>>> CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: >>>> This e-mail transmission contains information that is intended to >>>> be confidential. It is intended only for the addressee named >>>> above. If you receive this e-mail in error, please do not read, >>>> copy, or disseminate it. If you are not the intended recipient, >>>> any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of >>>> this information is prohibited. Please reply to the message >>>> immediately by informing the sender that the message was >>>> misdirected. After replying, please erase it from your computer >>>> system. Your assistance in correcting this error is appreciated. >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: >>>> >>>> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email >>>> >>>> >>>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: >> >> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email >> >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
