I also tried with an empty enumerated value, but it still does not work:
SimpleType longType =
simpleTypesFactory.getBuiltInType(simpleTypesFactory.getBuiltInTypeName(SimpleTypesFactory.LONG_TYPE));
SimpleType stringType = schema.createSimpleType(null,
simpleTypesFactory.getBuiltInType(simpleTypesFactory
.getBuiltInTypeName(SimpleTypesFactory.STRING_TYPE)));
stringType.addFacet(new Facet(Facet.ENUMERATION, ""));
Union emptyableLongType = new Union(schema);
emptyableLongType.addMemberType(longType);
emptyableLongType.addMemberType(stringType);
results in:
<xs:simpleType>
<xs:union>
<xs:simpleType>
<xs:restriction base="xs:string">
<xs:enumeration value=""/>
</xs:restriction>
</xs:simpleType>
</xs:union>
</xs:simpleType>
Werner Guttmann-6 wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> What should the XML schema eventually look like ?
>
> Cheers
> Werner
>
> philipp_s wrote:
>> I am trying to create a union between long and an empty string, but only
>> the
>> empty string simple type shows up in the xsd that is being created.
>>
>> This is the code i am using to create the Union:
>>
>> Union emptyableLongType = new
>> Union(schema);
>> SimpleType stringType = schema
>> .createSimpleType(null,
>> simpleTypesFactory
>> .getBuiltInType(simpleTypesFactory.getBuiltInTypeName(SimpleTypesFactory.STRING_TYPE)));
>> stringType.addFacet(new Facet(Facet.PATTERN,
>> ""));
>> emptyableLongType.addMemberType(stringType);
>> emptyableLongType.addMemberType(longType);
>>
>> but the resulting type in the schema looks like this:
>>
>> <xs:element name="some_element" minOccurs="0">
>> <xs:simpleType>
>> <xs:union>
>> <xs:simpleType>
>> <xs:restriction base="xs:string">
>> <xs:pattern value=""/>
>> </xs:restriction>
>> </xs:simpleType>
>> </xs:union>
>> </xs:simpleType>
>> </xs:element>
>>
>> what am I doing wrong? I tried this in the 0.9.6 version we were
>> originally
>> using, and also in 1.2 and 1.3 but got the same results.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>
> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Union-not-properly-working-in-schema-generation-tp23317574p24074977.html
Sent from the Castor - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
