Hi, This was discussed some while ago http://markmail.org/message/pa35jxfizpes3d3c . Castor should be aware of that namespace and even ignore location if available.
Regards, Stoil On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 6:31 PM, Sasan <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to parse the example provided in the link > > Listing4 which imports Listing 5 > > http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/ws-tip-imports.html > > Note: I am providing the link only because the xml in question is slightly > big for copy paste here, I hope you don't mind. > > However I get the error when parsing the "Type" > > Unable to resolve Schema corresponding to namespace ' > http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema'. > org.exolab.castor.xml.schema.SchemaException: Unable to resolve Schema > corresponding to namespace 'http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema'. > at > org.exolab.castor.xml.schema.reader.ImportUnmarshaller.<init>(ImportUnmarshaller.java:125) > at > org.exolab.castor.xml.schema.reader.SchemaUnmarshaller.startElement(SchemaUnmarshaller.java:604) > at > org.exolab.castor.xml.schema.reader.Sax2ComponentReader.startElement(Sax2ComponentReader.java:255) > at org.apache.xerces.parsers.AbstractSAXParser.startElement(Unknown > Source) > at > org.apache.xerces.parsers.AbstractXMLDocumentParser.emptyElement(Unknown > Source) > at > org.apache.xerces.impl.XMLDocumentFragmentScannerImpl.scanStartElement(Unknown > Source) > at > org.apache.xerces.impl.XMLDocumentFragmentScannerImpl$FragmentContentDispatcher.dispatch(Unknown > Source) > at > org.apache.xerces.impl.XMLDocumentFragmentScannerImpl.scanDocument(Unknown > Source) > at org.apache.xerces.parsers.XML11Configuration.parse(Unknown Source) > at org.apache.xerces.parsers.XML11Configuration.parse(Unknown Source) > at org.apache.xerces.parsers.XMLParser.parse(Unknown Source) > at org.apache.xerces.parsers.AbstractSAXParser.parse(Unknown Source) > at > org.exolab.castor.xml.schema.reader.SchemaReader.read(SchemaReader.java:301) > <more> > > > Is this a limitation introduced by castor? > > any info will be much appreciated. > > Thanks, > S. > > >
