Hi Martin,
can I assume that you have come across the auto-complete attribute o a
class mapping ? If not, it might be worth it. By using that mode, you
basically define partial mappings for classes (e.g. define a mapping for
those parts where the default is not applicable to your needs), and let
Castor (through) introspection figure out the remainder of the (class)
mapping.
Iow, no need to fiddle around with creating mappings programatically.
Regards
Werner
On 20.05.2010 16:44, [email protected] wrote:
Thanks for the code Brian. Nearly does it. The only problem with this is
that if I do the following:
MapTo mapTo = new MapTo();
mapTo.setXml("myCustomTagName");
ClassMapping rootClassMapping = new ClassMapping();
rootClassMapping.setName(MyType.class.getName());
rootClassMapping.setMapTo(mapTo);
xmlContext.addMapping(new
Mapping().getRoot().addClassMapping(rootClassMapping));
...I have to do the mapping of the fields of MyType myself. What I'm
really trying to do is let Castor introspect my class
and then just override the xml-name it created for it (which in this
case would be 'myType').
Von: Brian Sanders [mailto:[email protected]]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 20. Mai 2010 14:57
An: [email protected]
Betreff: RE: [castor-user] Dynamic Runtime Mapping with Castor
Not sure what you're trying to accomplish, but it sounds like something
I've done. Therefore, I will share the code...
See: http://cl1p.net/XmlEntityParser/
________________________________
Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 10:19:30 +0200
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: [castor-user] Dynamic Runtime Mapping with Castor
Hello everyone,
I'm wondering if there is a way to modify the xml-name of a top-level
class programmatically? My current solution works like this:
...
((XMLClassDescriptorImpl)this.marshaller.getResolver().resolve(marshalle
rTarget.getClass())).setXMLName("myCustomXMLName");
this.marshaller.marshal(marshallerTarget);
...
As you already may have noticed the problem with the above solution is
the unchecked cast to XMLClassDescriptorImpl as it is not guaranteed
that the resolve-method
returns an object of this type. For example if I pass an object of type
String to the resolve-method I get a StringClassDescriptor. In general
it would be interesting if there is a possibility to
modify the mapping-information (i.e. the state of the descriptors in
memory) at runtime without having to do conditional castings by using
instanceof-checks to get the appropriate descriptor.
Thanks in advance,
Best regards,
Martin
________________________________
Hotmail has tools for the New Busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your
inbox. Learn more.
<http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL
:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_1>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
