Yep - JPA work progressed greatly. Cayenne 3.0 version can be viewed
as "Cayenne Classic" and "Cayenne JPA" working in the same runtime.
My opinion is that standard JPA API hides too much stuff under the
hood, so a real application will end up using provider specific
features in some form anyways. In any event, in Cayenne we will
support both with some migration capability.
Andrus
On Feb 23, 2007, at 10:45 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:
Well, Andrus is hard at work on making Cayenne 3.0 JPA-compliant, so
perhaps you'd still be happy staying with Cayenne?
/dev/mrg
On 2/23/07, Dov Rosenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We are in the process of considering a migration away from our
current EOF
based application. We have used Cayenne and found it to be pretty
nice. Now
that JPA is starting to gain some traction should we reconsider
our decision
for Cayenne and aim instead of a JPA compatible framework?
Thanks in advance for any feedback you can provide
--
Dov Rosenberg
Inquira
Knowledge Management Experts
http://www.inquira.com
