Well, given that I'm not entirely sure what you are trying to do ... On
your:

    id = s.getSchedule_id(s.getId());

line, your getSchedule_id() method doesn't take a parameter, so that would
generate an error.  If you meant to call getSchedule(Long) there, then try
something like this:

    id = s.getSchedule_id(new Long(s.getId()));

Although I have to admit this seems a little confusing to me, too.  If all
you are trying to obtain is the ID, seems like you could get it calling your
getSchedule_id() method.

/dev/mrg


On 3/19/07, Frank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hi Michael ,
Here is more of my code:
I did not understand your statement
Thanks
Frank

public class Schedules extends _Schedules {
public int getSchedule_id() {
  return DataObjectUtils.intPKForObject(this);
}

private String getProvider(long pid) {
..
if (records.size() > -1) {
      Schedules s = new Schedules();
      s = (Schedules)records.get(0);
  // This line complains because it is an int value
      id = s.getSchedule_id(s.getId());
     }
}

private long getSchedule(Long pid) {
  Expression qualifier = ExpressionFactory.matchExp("scheduleDate",
c.getTime());
  qualifier =
qualifier.andExp(ExpressionFactory.matchDbExp(
Schedules.PROVIDER_ID_PROPERTY,
pid));
..
}
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Gentry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2007 1:20 PM
Subject: Re: problems querying int,long


> Try using a java.lang.Long or even a java.math.BigInteger.  If you use
the
> BigInteger, use String.valueOf(yourLong) to pass into the constructor
> (BigInteger() will take a String, but not a long).
>
> /dev/mrg
>
>
> On 3/19/07, Frank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am getting hung up on passing int and long values to cayenne.
>> In my MySQL database, all PK fields are defined as BIGINT.
>> The PK in my cayenne schemas are defined as long.
>> ExpressionFactory.matchDbExp is looking for an object, I am passing in
a
>> long.
>>
>> What is the best way to handle this?
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Frank
>>
>


Reply via email to