> I'm missing something. I don't understand why you don't do something
> along these lines.
>
> nonpersistentObject.setObjectId(new Timestamp());
Yes! I was trapped in my idea that a pk has to be integer :-(
Thank you!
> You don't have to use the same kinds of object ids for your
> non-persistent objects, and using a different type will guarantee that
> a persistent and non-persistent object will never be equal to each
> other.
And what about the NullPointerException I mentioned in the first email?
Peter.
___________________________________________________________
Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de
