You might be amused by this blog posting: http://arsenalist.com/2007/09/12/logging-abstraction-is-utterly-pointless/
Michael Gentry wrote: > I thought that part was amusing. I have no vested interest in any > logging decision. I was rather happy with printf() in my C code. :-) > However, after seeing errors in logs in legacy code I had to maintain > which said "An error has occurred" and no context provided, I do know > the benefits of good logging. > > /dev/mrg > > On 9/14/07, Andrus Adamchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Yeah... "It does things right: Logger, not Log." That's an >> improvement! :-) >> >> Andrus >> > >
