I don't have any performance numbers just yet. From the design
knowledge, my educated guess is that the translation phase will be
somewhat slower, as EJBQL goes through a longer chain of syntax
transformation, but the result retrieval should be as fast. Since the
translation phase has never been a bottleneck in the query execution
cycle, there is hopefully no noticeable overall performance hit.
Andrus
On Nov 13, 2007, at 5:50 AM, David Marko wrote:
Are there any performance differences(penalty) when using
EJBQLQuery instead of
e.g. SelectQuery?
Also for the others, I use succesfully
http://openjpa.apache.org/builds/1.0.1/apache-openjpa-1.0.1/docs/
manual/jpa_langref.html
as a very nice EJBQLQuery syntax manual.
David
