Anything else major?
I think the upgrade URL has all the major things summarized.
mostly, I think that's a positive thing, but I think there could be
some improvements in the generic definitions.
I'll submit jiras as I encounter them.
Good or bad (ok, context.newObject(..) no longer requires a cast,
that's cool), but for us this was mainly a reaction to the reality of
the Java 5 world, with Eclipse warnings on non-generics collections
and other "nice" things. So yeah, now let's do our best to take
advantage of this facility, since we can't simply ignore it anymore :-)
Andrus
On Mar 31, 2008, at 11:59 PM, Robert Zeigler wrote:
I'll be sticking with classic cayenne.
I've noticed the generic additions... mostly, I think that's a
positive thing, but I think there could be some improvements in the
generic definitions.
I'll submit jiras as I encounter them.
Robert
On Mar 31, 2008, at 3/313:25 PM , Michael Gentry wrote:
Are you planning on sticking with Classic Cayenne or using JPA?
Classic Cayenne is mostly the same, although there have been Java
generics additions (for good or bad), etc. You've noticed the
lifecycle stuff.
/dev/mrg
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 3:32 PM, Robert Zeigler
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm looking at upgrading a medium to large app from cayenne 2.0.3 to
3.0 M3.
It's a tapestry3/cayenne application. I looked over
http://cayenne.apache.org/doc/upgrade.html
.
The only thing listed there that may bite me is that the app makes
some use of Derived db entities, so I'll have to fix that.
I also seem to recall from the list that using setPersistenceState
as
a location for initializing properties of new objects is
deprecated in
favor of using the lifecycle callbacks.
Anything else major?
TIA!
Robert
