Dear all,

 

First of all, thank you for your great product. We are using it successfully 
since last year and we are very happy of the product quality.

 

Few days ago, we found a problem with our stored procedures access.

 

In order to illustrate you the problem in the best possible way, I'm going to 
use the following example.



This is an extract from our cayenne mapping file:

 

...

      <procedure name="spXXX" catalog="spp" returningValue="true">

            <procedure-parameter name="@RETURN_VALUE" type="INTEGER" length="4" 
direction="in"/>

            <procedure-parameter name="@po_result_cursor" type="VARCHAR" 
length="8" direction="in_out"/>

            <procedure-parameter name="@po_version" type="VARCHAR" length="8" 
direction="in_out"/>

            <procedure-parameter name="@po_error_message" type="VARCHAR" 
length="4000" direction="in_out"/>

            <procedure-parameter name="@po_error" type="NUMERIC" length="20" 
direction="in_out"/>

            <procedure-parameter name="@po_nbrecord" type="NUMERIC" length="20" 
direction="in_out"/>

            <procedure-parameter name="@pi_operator" type="VARCHAR" 
length="100" direction="in"/>

            <procedure-parameter name="@pi_parameters" type="VARCHAR" 
length="4000" direction="in"/>

            <procedure-parameter name="@pi_maxrow" type="INTEGER" length="4" 
direction="in"/>

            <procedure-parameter name="@pi_fromrow" type="INTEGER" length="4" 
direction="in"/>

            <procedure-parameter name="@pi_idonly" type="INTEGER" length="4" 
direction="in"/>

      </procedure>

...

 

Please note that stored procedure returns a result set (@RETURN_VALUE ... with 
the funny 'in' direction I know) and several output parameters.

 

We have the following problem.

Sometimes, due to internal error that can always occur, the stored procedure 
may not return a result set. 

In fact, when the stored procedure catches an internal error, that error is 
returned to the caller using the output parameters ... but no result set is 
provided (it's a normal behaviour as data are may be not accessible!).

 

But it seems cayenne requires to receive from the stored proc this 'mapped' 
result set, otherwise the following exception is displayed:

 

INFO  QueryLogger: {? = call spXXX(?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?)} [bind: NULL, 
NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, 'side', 
'<param><name>tTransaction.from_id</name><operator>=</operator><lvalue>400</lvalue><rvalue></rvalue><type>Number</type></param><param><name>tDateIds.day</name><operator>between</operator><lvalue>2008-04-10
 00:00:00</lvalue><rvalue>2008-04-10 
23:59:59</rvalue><type>DateTime</type></param>', 27, 1, 1]

INFO  QueryLogger: === updated 1 row.

INFO  QueryLogger: === updated 0 rows.

INFO  QueryLogger: *** error.

java.sql.SQLException: [Microsoft][SQLServer 2000 Driver for 
JDBC][SQLServer]Uncommittable transaction is detected at the end of the batch. 
The transaction is rolled back.

        at com.microsoft.jdbc.base.BaseExceptions.createException(Unknown 
Source)

        at com.microsoft.jdbc.base.BaseExceptions.getException(Unknown Source)

        at 
com.microsoft.jdbc.sqlserver.tds.TDSRequest.processErrorToken(Unknown Source)

        at 
com.microsoft.jdbc.sqlserver.tds.TDSRequest.processReplyToken(Unknown Source)

        at 
com.microsoft.jdbc.sqlserver.tds.TDSRPCRequest.processReplyToken(Unknown Source)

        at com.microsoft.jdbc.sqlserver.tds.TDSRequest.processReply(Unknown 
Source)

        at 
com.microsoft.jdbc.sqlserver.SQLServerImplStatement.getNextResultType(Unknown 
Source)

        at com.microsoft.jdbc.base.BaseStatement.getNextResultType(Unknown 
Source)

        at com.microsoft.jdbc.base.BaseStatement.getMoreResults(Unknown Source)

        at 
org.apache.cayenne.dba.sqlserver.SQLServerProcedureAction.performAction(SQLServerProcedureAction.java:105)

        at 
org.apache.cayenne.access.DataNodeQueryAction.runQuery(DataNodeQueryAction.java:59)

        at org.apache.cayenne.access.DataNode.performQueries(DataNode.java:273)

        at 
org.apache.cayenne.access.DataDomainQueryAction.runQuery(DataDomainQueryAction.java:301)

        at 
org.apache.cayenne.access.DataDomainQueryAction.access$000(DataDomainQueryAction.java:60)

        at 
org.apache.cayenne.access.DataDomainQueryAction$1.transform(DataDomainQueryAction.java:273)

        at 
org.apache.cayenne.access.DataDomain.runInTransaction(DataDomain.java:836)²

        at 
org.apache.cayenne.access.DataDomainQueryAction.runQueryInTransaction(DataDomainQueryAction.java:270)

        at 
org.apache.cayenne.access.DataDomainQueryAction.execute(DataDomainQueryAction.java:110)

        at org.apache.cayenne.access.DataDomain.onQuery(DataDomain.java:746)

        at 
org.apache.cayenne.util.ObjectContextQueryAction.runQuery(ObjectContextQueryAction.java:217)

        at 
org.apache.cayenne.access.DataContextQueryAction.execute(DataContextQueryAction.java:54)

        at org.apache.cayenne.access.DataContext.onQuery(DataContext.java:1395)

        at 
org.apache.cayenne.access.DataContext.performGenericQuery(DataContext.java:1350)

        ....

 

We did some test with the JTDS drivers too, but unfortunately with the same 
result (using cayenne 2.0.4). 

For information, using JDBC directly the situation is handled correctly.

 

I do hope you will be able to give us a solution in order to fix that issue, 
which is blocking for us.

 

Thank you in advance.

 

Marc Gabriel

Reply via email to