On Mon, 19 May 2008 11:07:11 -0400 "Mike Kienenberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not really sure why you don't use a regular java bean object to do > this. Because of the base class. I don't want to have my renderer check the class to decide how to handle it. What I could try would be to subclass from DataObject without having any info in the DataMap. Not sure how Cayenne would like that though. > However, I believe you could create a DataMap for all of these objects > in a separate DataNode. You don't have to create a table for them in > the database. That could be a solution. Ugly, but still working. > You might even be able to get away with having them in the same > DataMap, provided you don't try to update/insert/delete them during a > commit. There's no requirement that you create an actual table on > the database unless you execute sql accessing that table. Yes, I thought something like that. But still an ugly solution... Cheers, Adrian
