On Mon, 19 May 2008 10:59:56 -0400 "Mike Kienenberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If I were redoing it today, I'd probably consider a subclass of > Ordering. I think I will go that way as well... That is probably the easiest solution and I am very sure that there will somewhen appear the next field which needs some special sorting treatment. Murphy and stuff :) Thanks for your help. Cheers, Adrian
