Hi, context.deleteObjects(Collection objects) http://cayenne.apache.org/doc/api/org/apache/cayenne/access/DataContext.html#deleteObjects(java.util.Collection)
already exists, so I see some sense in adding context.registerObjects(Collection objects) from this perspective. Cheers, Borut 2008/6/4 Andrus Adamchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > There's been some effort to keep only the essential non-redundant methods > in the ObjectContext interface to make it more flexible for nested/ROP > operation and to simplify its proxying. I am neutral to adding the new > method to the *DataContext class*, as long as it doesn't make it to the > interface. > > Andrus > > > > On Jun 4, 2008, at 4:36 PM, Michael Gentry wrote: > > This seems reasonable. I'll open a ticket for it later. >> >> Thanks, >> >> /dev/mrg >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 8:34 AM, Borut Bolčina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> If I have a collection of transient CayenneDataObjects with no relations >>> between any of them and want to persist them, it would be convenient to >>> "say": >>> >>> context.registerObjects(myCayenneDataObjects); // sets state to NEW >>> context.commitChanges(); >>> >>> Now there is only a singular form of this method >>> >>> http://cayenne.apache.org/doc/api/org/apache/cayenne/ObjectContext.html#registerNewObject(java.lang.Object)<http://cayenne.apache.org/doc/api/org/apache/cayenne/ObjectContext.html#registerNewObject%28java.lang.Object%29> >>> >>> But probably there is a reason for not having this method. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Borut >>> >>> >
