On Aug 22, 2008, at 3:07 PM, Tore Halset wrote:
On Aug 22, 2008, at 13:36, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
Interesting... I am not using either for anything complex lately,
preferring manual SQL scripts executed with dbpatch Ant task, so I
am a bit out of the loop.
The sql-scripts is a very solid way to work, but some people would
probably prefer the ease of the modeler for such tasks. The merger
is also very good for verifying that your model and database is in
sync.
Totally agree. I just posted that to explain my own ignorance :-)
I would also love to have less redundancy and drop DbGenerator at a
point when there is a complete and more powerful replacement.
Merge call DbGenerator where DbGenerator has the needed
functionality. The reason for this is to save code and testing. It
could easily be refactored when we are happy with the merger.
Excellent. I'll keep that in mind.
Andrus
