Let me see if I get this right... In this example there is obviously no closed cycle. So you are saying AshwoodEntitySorter still assumes there is one, and gives up on ordering? Then this is a bug.

Andrus


On Jul 10, 2009, at 11:20 AM, Andrey Razumovsky wrote:

Imagine references avaliable A->B->C->A

1. Create dependant entity B
2. Create master entity A
3. b.setA(a)
4. Commit.

C is even never used.

Reply via email to