I'm in preparations for 3.0 ... but there was a lot of trouble this year, so I didn't get as far as I planned ...
For using 3.0 in productive environment ... Is there a time-scale for the final 3.0? 2009/11/25 Andrus Adamchik <[email protected]> > Do you have an option of trying this with 3.0? There were a few bug fixes > related to unstable data types in ObjectIds (e.g. the same ID can have a PK > mapping as a BigDecimal or Integer depending on how object was obtained). > Could be something related. > > Andrus > > > > On Nov 25, 2009, at 10:32 AM, Juergen Saar wrote: > > I'm using Version 2.0.4 ... >> >> 2009/11/25 Andrus Adamchik <[email protected]> >> >> Don't yet know what might be causing it, but what version of Cayenne are >>> you using? >>> >>> Andrus >>> >>> >>> On Nov 25, 2009, at 9:49 AM, Juergen Saar wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>>> >>>> we're using cayenne for the web-interface of a 20 year old project with >>>> meaningful keys. We don't use tapestry. The keys are handled in the >>>> validateForSave(). >>>> >>>> In some cases after commit there is an Exception: "Temporary ID hasn't >>>> been >>>> replaced on commit" >>>> The values of the Dataobject are OK and the Informations put to database >>>> are >>>> correct. >>>> >>>> In the Objects that cause this Exception I can't see any difference to >>>> Objects that don't cause this Execption. >>>> >>>> Is there anything I can do to force the replacement if the Temp ID or to >>>> prevent this Exception? >>>> >>>> Caching in cayenne is disabled, because there are many other >>>> applications >>>> also manipulating data in database. >>>> >>>> >>>> Any hint would help ... >>>> -Juergen- >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >
