Hi,

Yeah I just didn't step into it so it looked hollow at that point.

Sorry about that...

Thank you for the help!

On 28/04/2010, at 8:18 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:

> Definitely odd. This line should trigger object inflation and turning it to 
> committed state:
> 
>> String code = si.getUser().getUserType().getCode();
> 
> Maybe worth running in debugger to see what's really going on... Maybe 
> something from CayenneDataObject got overridden, etc. Specifically check 
> BaseContext.prepareForAccess(..) method that should handle inflating the 
> object.
> 
> Andrus
> 
> On Apr 28, 2010, at 4:05 PM, Julius Spencer wrote:
> 
>> Hi Andrus,
>> 
>> Thank you for the response. Here is the code taking a user and putting it 
>> into the SessionInfo.
>> 
>>                              TCMSessionInfo si = (TCMSessionInfo) 
>> getContext().getSessionInfo(false);
>>                              si = (TCMSessionInfo) 
>> getContext().getSessionInfo(true);
>>                              si.setUser((TCMUser) 
>> si.getDefaultDataContext().localObject(user.getObjectId(), null));
>> 
>> later I check that there is a user in the session, but when I try to get a 
>> related DataObject:
>> 
>>              TCMSessionInfo si = (TCMSessionInfo) 
>> cdrContext.getExistingSessionInfo();
>>              if(null!=si.getUser())
>>                      String code = si.getUser().getUserType().getCode();
>>              
>> the the user appears to look like this:
>>              {<ObjectId:TCMUser, ZID=200>; hollow; []}
>> 
>> Thanks for any advice.
>> 
>> 
>> On 28/04/2010, at 7:51 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Julius,
>>> 
>>> How was it "shifted" to a new context? Maybe you can provide some sample 
>>> code?
>>> 
>>> Andrus
>>> 
>>> On Apr 28, 2010, at 11:37 AM, Julius Spencer wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> I'm a new user of Cayenne and I have a problem with an object I'm not 
>>>> expecting to be "hollow".
>>>> 
>>>> I am using STABLE-3.0 and have fetched a DataObject then shifted it to a 
>>>> new DataContext and then it seems to stay HOLLOW even after querying a 
>>>> to-one relationship.
>>>> 
>>>> Just wondering if anyone has come across this or maybe it's a common 
>>>> mistake.
>>>> 
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Julius.
>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 

Reply via email to