Hi Ramiro, based on the model that you sent me earlier, I was able to reproduce another error and identify its cause:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAY-1746 So slowly getting there... > Maybe I am just doing everything the wrong way, butI am starting to think > that vertical inheritance is just not supported at all :( at least not it if > has relationships, I am willing to help testing but even I will love to > contribute, my boss won't allow me to work full time on this to be able to > understand and fix all the issues, so I think I will need to move to > horizontal inheritance even it is not what I would like to do :( No actually your mapping is correct. And I don't see problems with vertical inheritance per se, but rather with the flattened relationships and attributes present in common inheritance mappings. There are certainly rough spots in those. And common vertical inheritance scenarios are helping us to identify them. We'll work on fixing those of course. I really appreciate your desire to help fixing all these, and perfectly understand your work situation. Bearing with me on all these issues is already helping us :) As to what you should do in your application, I suggest the following - since "vertical" inheritance in Cayenne is really the same as "single table", only with flattened attributes and relationships (and it is the combination of the later that is giving us hard time), how about you keep the inheritance, but "unflatten" everything in subclasses, using individual ObjEntities and regular relationships for session_log_api and session_log_web? This should work more reliably. Thanks, Andrus On Oct 8, 2012, at 7:28 PM, Ramiro Aparicio <[email protected]> wrote: > I found another error in this case, if Session has a couple of attributes and > a relationship on his own, you can not recover Session from the related > entities. > In my case Session it is related to ActivityLog so what I am doing here is > just calling activityLog.getToSession() and this raises an instanciation > error because Session is abstract and does not try to instanciate the subclass > > org.apache.cayenne.CayenneRuntimeException: [v.3.1B1 May 28 2012 18:42:43] > Error creating object of class 'com.proton.ks.persistence.SessionLog' > at > org.apache.cayenne.reflect.PersistentDescriptor.createObject(PersistentDescriptor.java:288) > at > org.apache.cayenne.reflect.LazyClassDescriptorDecorator.createObject(LazyClassDescriptorDecorator.java:73) > at > org.apache.cayenne.access.DataContext.findOrCreateObject(DataContext.java:1178) > at > org.apache.cayenne.access.ObjectResolver.objectFromDataRow(ObjectResolver.java:151) > at > org.apache.cayenne.access.ObjectResolver.objectFromDataRow(ObjectResolver.java:137) > at > org.apache.cayenne.access.ObjectResolver.objectsFromDataRows(ObjectResolver.java:121) > at > org.apache.cayenne.access.ObjectResolver.synchronizedObjectsFromDataRows(ObjectResolver.java:102) > at > org.apache.cayenne.access.ObjectResolver.synchronizedRootResultNodeFromDataRows(ObjectResolver.java:93) > at > org.apache.cayenne.access.DataDomainQueryAction$ObjectConversionStrategy.toResultsTree(DataDomainQueryAction.java:581) > at > org.apache.cayenne.access.DataDomainQueryAction$SingleObjectConversionStrategy.convert(DataDomainQueryAction.java:637) > at > org.apache.cayenne.access.DataDomainQueryAction.interceptObjectConversion(DataDomainQueryAction.java:465) > at > org.apache.cayenne.access.DataDomainQueryAction.execute(DataDomainQueryAction.java:129) > at org.apache.cayenne.access.DataDomain.onQueryNoFilters(DataDomain.java:754) > at > org.apache.cayenne.access.DataDomain$DataDomainQueryFilterChain.onQuery(DataDomain.java:1003) > at org.apache.cayenne.access.DataDomain.onQuery(DataDomain.java:744) > at > org.apache.cayenne.util.ObjectContextQueryAction.runQuery(ObjectContextQueryAction.java:350) > at > org.apache.cayenne.util.ObjectContextQueryAction.executePostCache(ObjectContextQueryAction.java:106) > at > org.apache.cayenne.util.ObjectContextQueryAction.execute(ObjectContextQueryAction.java:93) > at org.apache.cayenne.access.DataContext.onQuery(DataContext.java:989) > at org.apache.cayenne.access.DataContext.performQuery(DataContext.java:978) > at org.apache.cayenne.access.ToOneFault.doResolveFault(ToOneFault.java:81) > at org.apache.cayenne.access.ToOneFault.resolveFault(ToOneFault.java:54) > at > org.apache.cayenne.CayenneDataObject.readProperty(CayenneDataObject.java:186) > at > com.proton.ks.persistence.cayenne._ActivityLog.getToSessionLog(_ActivityLog.java:73) > > I can just make Session (SessionLog in my app) non abstract but even then I > will not be able to reach SessionWeb or SessionClient (and their attributes) > as I can not create a relationship to them. In modeller session table there > is such relations, but in classes there aren't and can not be created. > > Maybe I am just doing everything the wrong way, butI am starting to think > that vertical inheritance is just not supported at all :( at least not it if > has relationships, I am willing to help testing but even I will love to > contribute, my boss won't allow me to work full time on this to be able to > understand and fix all the issues, so I think I will need to move to > horizontal inheritance even it is not what I would like to do :( > > > > > El 08/10/2012 14:15, Andrus Adamchik escribió: >>> In our model the session table is a MYSQL autoincrement field so it is >>> marked as database generated on Session table, but as sessionWeb and >>> sessionClient rely on Session id they have PK strategy as default, but on >>> commit I get an error creating the sessionWeb row as id is null. >> The first thing to doublecheck is a DbRelationship between Session and >> sessionWeb (and Session and sessionClient) - it must be 1..1 and have "To >> Dep PK" checked. This should propagate the PK from Session to the dependent >> tables. >> >> If that doesn't help, yeah, you can send me the model. >> >> Andrus >> >> >> On Oct 8, 2012, at 2:44 PM, Ramiro Aparicio <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Andrus, >>> >>> First of all thank you for all the effort and the fast reply time, I really >>> appreciate your help with this issue. >>> Then the bad news after some decompiling to understand how to load modules >>> on web containers I was able to configure everything but it seemed that >>> still did not want to work, debugging the problem is that my relationships >>> are marked as runtime even if they are defined in the model, so to avoid >>> that I just removed that condition from your code (not sure if that can >>> create some problems in the future) but now I am struggling against a >>> commit exception because of the PK. >>> In our model the session table is a MYSQL autoincrement field so it is >>> marked as database generated on Session table, but as sessionWeb and >>> sessionClient rely on Session id they have PK strategy as default, but on >>> commit I get an error creating the sessionWeb row as id is null. >>> >>> Here is the sequence of inserts as logged: >>> >>> [2012-10-08 13:38:05,376] [http-8443-2] INFO >>> (CommonsJdbcEventLogger.java:logBeginTransaction:350)- --- transaction >>> started. >>> [2012-10-08 13:38:05,392] [http-8443-2] INFO >>> (CommonsJdbcEventLogger.java:logQuery:299)- INSERT INTO session_log >>> (sessionStart, sessionType) VALUES (?, ?) >>> [2012-10-08 13:38:05,392] [http-8443-2] INFO >>> (CommonsJdbcEventLogger.java:logQueryParameters:312)- [bind: >>> 1->sessionStart:'2012-10-08 13:38:05.314', 2->sessionType:2] >>> [2012-10-08 13:38:05,408] [http-8443-2] INFO >>> (CommonsJdbcEventLogger.java:logGeneratedKey:218)- Generated PK: >>> session_log.idSessionLog = 102839 >>> [2012-10-08 13:38:05,408] [http-8443-2] INFO >>> (CommonsJdbcEventLogger.java:logUpdateCount:344)- === updated 1 row. >>> [2012-10-08 13:38:05,408] [http-8443-2] INFO >>> (CommonsJdbcEventLogger.java:logQuery:299)- INSERT INTO activity_log >>> (Document_idDocument, SessionLog_idSessionLog, action, log_datetime, >>> msg_params, successful) VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?) >>> [2012-10-08 13:38:05,408] [http-8443-2] INFO >>> (CommonsJdbcEventLogger.java:logQueryParameters:312)- [bind: >>> 1->Document_idDocument:NULL, 2->SessionLog_idSessionLog:102839, >>> 3->action:04, 4->log_datetime:'2012-10-08 13:38:05.314', >>> 5->msg_params:NULL, 6->successful:NULL] >>> [2012-10-08 13:38:05,408] [http-8443-2] INFO >>> (CommonsJdbcEventLogger.java:logGeneratedKey:218)- Generated PK: >>> activity_log.idActivityLog = 124301 >>> [2012-10-08 13:38:05,408] [http-8443-2] INFO >>> (CommonsJdbcEventLogger.java:logUpdateCount:344)- === updated 1 row. >>> [2012-10-08 13:38:05,408] [http-8443-2] INFO >>> (CommonsJdbcEventLogger.java:logQuery:299)- INSERT INTO session_log_web >>> (User_idUser, id, ip, userAgent) VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?) >>> [2012-10-08 13:38:05,408] [http-8443-2] INFO >>> (CommonsJdbcEventLogger.java:logQueryParameters:312)- [batch bind: >>> 1->User_idUser:NULL, 2->id:NULL, 3->ip:< 7F,00,00,01>, >>> 4->userAgent:'Computer/Windows 7/Firefox'] >>> >>> I need to check why the idUser is null but that maybe a controller error. >>> If you are ok with that I can send you the full model so you can check >>> everything is configured as it should (I think I double checked everything >>> but just in case). >>> >>> I will try any workaround I am able to imagine and publish any new info. >>> >>> Ramiro Aparicio >>> >>> El 05/10/2012 23:12, Andrus Adamchik escribió: >>>> Oh, and actually I think we can fix it in the interim per >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAY-1744 … The "hack" in the example >>>> makes me blush :) >>>> >>>> Andrus >>>> >>>> >>>> On Oct 6, 2012, at 12:04 AM, Andrus Adamchik <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Ramiro, >>>>> >>>>> Finally I have something specific for you: >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAY-1743 >>>>> >>>>> In the source code attached to this Jira, I am simply blocking "readOnly" >>>>> status of all model relationships. The example is a completely >>>>> self-conatined project. It is built against 3.2M1-SNAPSHOT (SVN trunk), >>>>> but it should work with 3.1B1 as well. And for 3.0.x, you can simply >>>>> "inline" the fancy DI module code in "cayennehacks"… >>>>> >>>>> Take a look at Main.java and cayennehacks package. The "hacks" is what it >>>>> takes now to make vertical inheritance relationships work. >>>>> >>>>>> If I try to creat a entity relationship on User I must set the target to >>>>>> Session entity and not WebSession, if I set it to WebSession tells me >>>>>> there is no mapping and if I choose the correct mapping to WebSession >>>>>> then as there is no entity linked to that table it complains about no >>>>>> target entity. >>>>> This part worked for me on 3.1B1 Modeler. >>>>> >>>>> Andrus >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Oct 5, 2012, at 5:28 PM, Ramiro Aparicio <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> El 19/09/2012 22:12, Andrus Adamchik escribió: >>>>>>> On Sep 19, 2012, at 11:24 AM, Ramiro Aparicio >>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> BTW I tried to do everything with 3.0.2 modeller and finally updated >>>>>>>> to 3.1.B1 modeller, Will the model created with 3.1.B1 modeller work >>>>>>>> with 3.0.2 runtime? (I want to update the runtime but just in case I >>>>>>>> can not do it). >>>>>>> No, once you upgrade the Model to 3.1, there's no (automated) way to go >>>>>>> back to 3.0. The project structure is different in 3.1. The biggest >>>>>>> change is that the new projects have at most 1 domain per project. It >>>>>>> is probably doable by manually editing XML, but there's little point in >>>>>>> that. After all the only reason to use the new Modeler is if you are >>>>>>> planning to use the new runtime. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'll try to find time to get to the rest of your message. I rarely if >>>>>>> ever use vertical inheritance, but I may try out your scenario. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Andrus >>>>>>> >>>>>> Hi again, >>>>>> Ok after the big refactoring I am now able to test this and I get this >>>>>> exception on commit: >>>>>> "Cannot set the read-only flattened relationship 'toUser' in ObjEntity >>>>>> 'SessionLogWeb'." >>>>>> or >>>>>> "Cannot set the read-only flattened relationship 'runtimeRelationship1' >>>>>> in ObjEntity 'SessionLog'." >>>>>> depending on which side I try to use when setting the relationship. >>>>>> (SessionLogWeb is WebSession on my previous example and SessionLog is >>>>>> Session) >>>>>> >>>>>> So even if only one side of the relationship is marked as read only it >>>>>> is not possible to set the relationship from either side, as this kind >>>>>> of mapping is a bit unexplored using cayenne I will happily try any >>>>>> different options but I would like to mantain the vertical inheritance >>>>>> as this is a logging table that will hold millions of records so using a >>>>>> shared table will waste too much space. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks in advance. >>>>>> >>>>>> Ramiro Aparicio >>>>>> >>> > >
