It's in the example project ERCayenneExample On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 8:46 AM Hugi Thordarson <h...@karlmenn.is> wrote:
> Ah, excellent! Where inside ERCayenne are they though, can’t find them at > a quick glance. > > - hugi > > // Hugi Thordarson > // http://www.loftfar.is/ <http://www.loftfar.is/> > // s. 895-6688 > > > > > On 1. apr. 2015, at 14:03, John Huss <johnth...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > There are WO friendly templates for Cayenne in the ERCayenne framework in > > Project Wonder that you can copy. > > On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 7:18 AM Michael Gentry <mgen...@masslight.net> > wrote: > > > >> This works with 3.0.2. I need to upgrade it for 3.1, but hopefully > it'll > >> give you the general idea: > >> > >> https://github.com/mrg/cbe/tree/master/Templates > >> > >> http://mrg.github.io/cbe/custom-templates.html > >> > >> mrg > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 8:57 AM, Hugi Thordarson <h...@karlmenn.is> > wrote: > >> > >>> Hi Michael. > >>> Thanks for the pointer, I’d love an example of rolling my own > templates. > >>> Are the standard default templates accessible somewhere? > >>> > >>> Also, is class file generation accessible via an API or otherwise > >>> supported outside of the Modeler? One convenient feature of WOLips > (when > >>> using EOF) is autogeneration of classes every time the model changes. > If > >>> this doesn’t currently exist in Cayenne I’d like to implement it. > >>> > >>> Cheers, > >>> - hugi > >>> > >>> // Hugi Thordarson > >>> // http://www.loftfar.is/ <http://www.loftfar.is/> > >>> // s. 895-6688 > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>> On 1. apr. 2015, at 12:47, Michael Gentry <mgen...@masslight.net> > >> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Hi Hugi, > >>>> > >>>> You can roll your own templates (I've done this in the past) and > change > >>> the > >>>> names if you like, but keep in mind it may complicate your life if you > >>> use > >>>> other projects (such as Tapestry) which rely upon the Java Beans > >>> convention > >>>> (get*, set*, is*) when doing reflection to call the Cayenne methods. > >>>> > >>>> If you want to roll your own templates, I can point you to an example. > >>>> > >>>> mrg > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 6:44 AM, Hugi Thordarson <h...@karlmenn.is> > >>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Hi all. > >>>>> Can I generate my DataObject classes without a “get”-prefix for > >>> attribute > >>>>> accessor names? I much prefer the style of “name()” over “getName()”. > >>>>> > >>>>> Cheers, > >>>>> - hugi > >>>>> > >>>>> PS: Sorry for my flooding of the list. Catching up on previous work > on > >>>>> migration from EOF— I must say 4.0.M2 looks just awesome. > >>> > >>> > >> > >
