> On Jun 12, 2015, at 6:09 PM, Mike Kienenberger <mkien...@gmail.com> wrote: > > And, interestingly enough, I only have 8 "PoolManagerCleanup" threads, > and not the 9 that I expected. Maybe they are create-on-demand and > one of my runtimes hasn't needed it yet?
There should be 3 actually. One per PoolManager, not one per connection. So something may be going on there. FWIW 4.0.M3 (master branch) has a completely new non-blocking alternative to PoolManager. The cleanup process is also more sane there. Andrus
