There's a lot of ex-EOF/ex-WO folks involved with this project (including me).
Do we still have the model converter out there? When I started using Cayenne back in the 1.1 days, we had a converter tool that would create a cayenne project out of an EOF project. I'm not sure if it's still around or if it needs to be updated -- even back then there were some rough edges. On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 3:26 PM, Hugi Thordarson <h...@karlmenn.is> wrote: > Hi Andrus. > > Words can't describe how happy I am with your helpfulness and the general > niceness of the Cayenne community. I fully realize you’re putting in free > work for me to benefit from. > > I've started working on a proposal for the WebObjects-world to migrate > Project Wonder to Cayenne, or at least put EOF and Cayenne functionality in > separate frameworks so people can easily choose between frameworks and > migrate old code. I think there’s a great opportunity there to help out > developers that are anxious to move forward with projects that are stuck in > what’s essentially a dead ecosystem. I want to be a little more familiar with > Cayenne before suggesting such a thing, though, since I want to be able to > help out with the migration and the flood of users that will hopefully follow. > > Cheers, > - hugi > > // Hugi Thordarson > // http://www.loftfar.is/ <http://www.loftfar.is/> > // s. 895-6688 > > > >> On 13. sep. 2015, at 19:02, Andrus Adamchik <and...@objectstyle.org> wrote: >> >> Hi Hugi, >> >> This was a big enough hole in the API, that I felt it needed fixing. I just >> added support for the "path+" EJBQL syntax to Cayenne per >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAY-2027 . So you can build Cayenne >> from master and use it right away. >> >> Andrus >> >> >>> On Sep 12, 2015, at 9:03 AM, Hugi Thordarson <h...@karlmenn.is> wrote: >>> >>> Hi all. >>> >>> Since converting Expressions that use outer joins to EJBQL doesn’t work in >>> Cayenne, I find myself now using somewhat kludgy methods to invoke >>> aggregate methods (for example to retrieve the count of records that an >>> expression will yield). >>> >>> Does anyone have a good solution or is there a standard way to do this? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> - hugi >>> >>> // Hugi Thordarson >>> // http://www.loftfar.is/ <http://www.loftfar.is/> >>> // s. 895-6688 >> >