Admirable effort and duly noted. I know I’d have loved it if someone did this
before me and shared the result, so I’ll keep the Informix-specific stuff
separate from everything else and we’ll see if this ends up going far enough to
make the DB in question “cayenne compatible”. It’s a reeeaaally obscure case
though :).
- hugi
> On 13. okt. 2015, at 15:35, Mike Kienenberger <mkien...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> We are willing to support older obsolete versions of databases as well
> as new ones. :)
>
> Our Oracle driver code is an example of how we support multiple driver
> versions.
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Hugi Thordarson <h...@karlmenn.is> wrote:
>> I’m not sure how useful my work would be since I’m writing against a 15 year
>> old Informix version, incompatible with modern JDBC-drivers (for example,
>> modern Informix JDBC drivers support {fn ucase} just fine). We’re planning
>> to switch this customer to Postgres as soon as they have the resources.
>>
>> But I’ll of course be happy to contribute any code I create if anyone
>> happens to need to communicate with Informix 9.30 in the future :)
