Fair enough. We do need to provide reverse engineering settings. I think those 
may be implemented as the properties of the DataMap, like default package, etc.

Andrus

> On Jun 26, 2016, at 4:47 PM, Gmail <tgiacc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> There are a lot of project using something other than the traditional Java 
> Date.
> 
> Tony Giaccone
> 
>> On Jun 25, 2016, at 5:30 PM, Andrus Adamchik <and...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
>> 
>> I wonder if instead of (in addition to) Joda preferences, we add a single 
>> preference - "Java 8", and if that's on use the new Java 8 date/time types 
>> that were all influenced by Joda. Thoughts?
>> 
>> Andrus
>> 
>>> On Jun 22, 2016, at 2:01 PM, Anthony Giaccone 
>>> <anthony.giacc...@nytimes.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Yeah,
>>> 
>>> I have an existing schema and it’s something of a mess, and were using git, 
>>> so different branches have different schemas with different attributes.  So 
>>> I’m re-engineering a lot. 
>>> 
>>> I did what you suggested the first three times but then I was like. "Meh, 
>>> there should be a better way….”
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Maybe something as simple as a preferences page which specifies what class 
>>> to use for the basic mappings?  Or maybe even easier, “Joda Time” and a 
>>> check box. 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Tony
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I’m also changing a bunch of lookup tables that curren
>>> 
>>>> On Jun 22, 2016, at 12:19 PM, John Huss <johnth...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> If this is a one-time task, just open up the cayenne-*.map.xml file in a
>>>> text editor and do a Find and Replace All of "java.util.Date" with
>>>> "org.joda.time.DateTime".
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 11:06 AM Tony Giaccone <tgiacc...@gmail.com> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> When reverse engineering a database, the java.util.Date class is used in
>>>>> all the classes that reference timestamps. Is there a way to get this to
>>>>> default to another class?  I'd like to use Joda's org.joda.time.DateTime
>>>>> instead.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Is there an easy way to swap this out when the classes get generated?
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Tony
>> 

Reply via email to