On 27.11.2007, at 16:32, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
On Nov 25, 2007 5:45 PM, Mark Fortner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It might be better to simply maintain it as a VFS plugin since VFS
supports
other file systems as well as WebDAV. It would give people a
single place
to go, rather than to fragment support for different file systems
amongst
different projects within Apache.
Many use cases for the WebDAV client library go beyond the feature set
exposed by the VFS interface, so it's better to have a more generic
WebDAV client library that VFS then uses to provide a file system
abstraction.
+1
A webdav implementation is out of scope of VFS IMO.
cheers
--
Torsten
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
