On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 3:03 PM, Daniel Schwager <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Rahul, > > in <parallel> section, a <onentry> element have to work also with > context variables > (http://www.w3.org/TR/scxml/#N102F2) - but I got an exception like shown > below. > > If I remove the log-statement in parallel.onentry, the fsm works fine > ... > > It must be a bug - isn't it ? > <snip/>
Looks like it. Originally, the spec didn't require (and therefore, Commons SCXML didn't implement) <onentry> / <onexit> children of <parallel>. Please submit a smallest possible test case (and a patch, if you want) to the Commons SCXML project in JIRA. Thanks! -Rahul > Regards > Danny > > > <?xml version="1.0"?> > <scxml xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/07/scxml"; version="1.0" > xmlns:cs="http://commons.apache.org/scxml"; > initialstate="running"> > > <parallel id="running"> > <onentry> > <log expr="'We are in running'" /> > </onentry> > > <state id="state1"> > <onentry> > <log expr="'We are in state1'" /> > </onentry> > </state> > > <state id="state12" /> > </parallel> > </scxml> > > Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException > at > org.apache.commons.scxml.SCInstance.getContext(SCInstance.java:178) > at org.apache.commons.scxml.model.Log.execute(Log.java:102) > at > org.apache.commons.scxml.semantics.SCXMLSemanticsImpl.executeActions(SCX > MLSemanticsImpl.java:232) > at > org.apache.commons.scxml.SCXMLExecutor.reset(SCXMLExecutor.java:252) > at > org.apache.commons.scxml.SCXMLExecutor.go(SCXMLExecutor.java:351) > at > de.dtnet.virtcenter.util.scxml.persistence.domain.StateMachine.go(StateM > achine.java:231) > ... 23 more > ... Removed 22 stack frames > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
