I agree, there's probably other user groups that this question is probably
suited for. I figured somebody here might have an answer though.
(Embedded image moved to file: pic25547.jpg)
Reinhardt
Christiansen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] To
a> Commons Users List
<[email protected]>
09/12/2008 08:49 AM cc
Subject
Please respond to Re: General Database Question
"Commons Users
List"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
e.org>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have a process that I've archived into a jar file. That jar file gets
called
> on a schedule, on a Windows machine. Part of my process queries 3 tables in
an
> MS Access database to extract the data and dump it to a DB2 database. I've
> noticed that the last few times it has ran, it always returns 20000 records
from
> one of the tables. I've seen that particular table have fewer records, like
in
> the 2000 to 3000 range, as much as 15000+, but now it keeps returning exactly
> 20000. I didn't like the fact that the number was so round, so I created a
test
> class that does a simple "SELECT COUNT(*) FROM" and I pass the table name as a
> parameter to the class. I was shocked to see that the result was in fact
20000
> for the particular table in question.
>
> So I guess my question is, could the Access database be locked down to only
hold
> a maximum of 20000 records in a given table? Or is there something else going
> on?
>
It's a reasonable question, given the circumstances, but it doesn't seem
like a question that has much to do with the mailing list. I'd be asking
it on an Access user group, such as microsoft.public.access on
msnews.microsoft.com.
Just a friendly suggestion.....
--
Rhino
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
