On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Ingmar Kliche <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Rony, > we used the native Rhino API. Would be interesting to see if BSF is useful > for an integration with commons-SCXML. <snip/>
It is, and would be a welcome addition if it became available (in the meantime, native rhino API is just fine too). -Rahul > Does BSF separate out context and > evaluator? > > - Ingmar. > > 2008/12/16 Rony G. Flatscher (Apache) <[email protected]> > >> Hi Ingmar, >> >> how did that get implemented? >> >> Did you use by any chance BSF <http://jakarta.apache.org/bsf>? If so, >> then not only JavaScript/Rhino would be available, but any of the >> supported scripting languages! >> >> ---rony >> >> >> >> Ingmar Kliche wrote: >> > Hi Roger, >> > >> > yes, we have implemented it and plan to provide it to the project quite >> > soon. But the licensing issue is a good point and should be clarified. >> > Technically the implementation needs some final cleanup and things like >> test >> > cases. If you can wait another couple of weeks (due to holiday season) it >> > should be available. >> > >> > Regards, >> > Ingmar. >> > >> > 2008/12/16 Roger Hoover <[email protected]> >> > >> > >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> Has anyone implemented Javascript as an expression language in SCXML >> Common >> >> with Rhino? Would there be licensing issues with SCXML under Apache >> >> license >> >> and Rhino under MPL/GPL/LGPL triple license? >> >> >> >> If it can't be done as part of this project, how hard would it be to >> >> implement externally and do others have interest in it? >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> >> >> Roger >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
