On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 8:13 PM, kennardconsulting <[email protected]> wrote: > I was wondering if it was possible to retain this goodness whilst changing > to a different getter/setter naming convention? Instead of 'getFoo()', > 'setFoo(x)', I'd like to use 'foo()' and 'foo_$eq(x)' which is the native > Scala naming convention.
Why not annotating your Scala classes with @scala.reflect.BeanInfo so a proper BeanInfo gets generated? Regards, Michael Nascimento Santos https://genesis.dev.java.net/ https://jsr-310.dev.java.net/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
