On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 3:56 PM, ralph.goers @dslextreme.com <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 11:36 AM, James Carman > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Correct, but WebDAV isn't a "core" provider yet. So, it's defined here: >> >> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/vfs/trunk/sandbox/src/main/resources/META-INF/vfs-providers.xml >> >> And, Mark was correct also. You can turn up logging and it will show >> you what is being registered and what is not. >> > > Actually, webdav is now a "core" provider in trunk. I did find the > providers.xml (It is NOT named vfs-providers.xml for default configuration). > I will have to experiment some to make sure it is configurationed correctly > so that it doesn't cause any problems if the webdav dependencies aren't > present. I'll take care of this and removing the webdav definition from the > sandbox as soon as I can.
Ahhh, didn't know that it had been moved. I assumed since it was still listed in the sandbox's provider file that it was still a sandbox (and thus "plugin") provider. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
