Aren't there two connections involved here - i.e. the control and data connections?
Surely the data connection will be kept alive by the STOR command; the NOOP is presumably only needed on the control connection? I would question whether the F5 load balancer is working correctly if it fails to take the data connection traffic into account. But I could be wrong. On 03/03/2009, Meeraj Kunnumpurath <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > That is what I have done. > > If I do the STOR and NOOP on two threads, isn't there a possible race > condition with the response for STOR and NOOP coming back the same time as > they share the same socket? > Ta > > Meeraj > > > On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 6:54 PM, Daniel F. Savarese <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > In message <[email protected]>, Rory Winston > > writ > > es: > > >Currently, FTPClient doesnt support keepalive, but I suspect that it > > >probably should. I'll raise a JIRA ticket. > > > > There's nothing stopping the programmer fromn sending a NOOP every > > t seconds over the control connection. However, if one expects > > FTPClient to do it automatically, then, sure, it doesn't support it. > > > > daniel > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
