> -----Original Message----- > From: Ted Dunning [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Saturday, August 22, 2009 1:03 AM > To: Commons Users List > Subject: Re: [VFS] Minimum Java version > > +1 for 1.6
Since we are +1'ing, +1 for 1.6 (or a least 1.5) G > > On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 12:57 AM, rzo <[email protected]> wrote: > > > +1 for 1.5 > > > > - Ron > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/yajsw/ > > > > [email protected] wrote: > > > >> On Wed, 19 Aug 2009, Ralph Goers wrote: > >> > >> Currently the minimum Java version for VFS 2.0 is 1.4. VFS 2.0 has > not > >>> been released and the developers are considering making the minimum > version > >>> JDK 5. We are interested in getting feedback from the community > however > >>> before this change is made. So please respond with your thoughts on > this. > >>> > >> > >> > >> In favour of 1.5 as minimum. > >> Older JDKs are EOL - and java5 came with a lot of enhancements. > >> > >> -- > >> David J. M. Karlsen - +47 90 68 22 43 > >> http://www.davidkarlsen.com > >> http://mp3.davidkarlsen.com > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >> > >> > >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > > -- > Ted Dunning, CTO > DeepDyve --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
