I've mailed him and he promised to take a look when he will have time. Meanwhile he suggested me to contact ASM mailing list and ask for assistance there.
However, it seems I've found smth. interesting. Torsten, could you please quickly take a look at the following diff: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/sandbox/javaflow/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/javaflow/bytecode/transformation/asm/ContinuationMethodAdapter.java?r1=733503&r2=733955&diff_format=h most importantly, at lines 93-97 and 185-190. As far as I understand, field "analyzer" is an analyzer constructed by original bytecode, and "canalyzer" is the one created for instrumented (partly instrumented???) bytecode. And it seems that logic of "indexed access" is changed during transition to ASM 3.1... Probably this is just a tiny bug that can be easily fixed? Torsten Curdt-3 wrote: > > >> Btw, is Eugen still participate in Javaflow project? Need fix for this >> bug >> too, but JVM bytecode is a Greek for me... > > Feel free to ping him ;) but I think pretty much everyone has moved > on. The project needs a new driver that speaks "Greek" ;) > > cheers > -- > Torsten > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > -- View this message in context: http://n4.nabble.com/JAVAFLOW-Running-a-Javaflow-example-tp747470p974366.html Sent from the Commons - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
