This comparison is also confounded by the fact that most C++ libraries try
to make use of native binary libraries such as ATLAS and often get a
dramatic speedup as a result.

On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Peter Abeles <[email protected]>wrote:

> I have seen some adhoc comparisons on-line. Mostly just matrix multiply.
> Having said that I wouldn't be surprised if I missed something.  Based
> on personal experience I would expect about a 2-3 times speed hit
> between well written java and c/c++ code because of array overhead and
> language constraints.  For pure arithmetic I have gotten nearly
> identical performance.
>



-- 
Ted Dunning, CTO
DeepDyve

Reply via email to