In my opinion, it depends on the global policy in commons-pool about
Java 1.4. Other commons project (Lang for example) are only supporting
Java 1.5 in their next big version.
On 16/02/2010 23:43, Christopher Schultz wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Kay,
On 2/16/2010 5:31 PM, Kay Kay wrote:
On 2/16/10 2:20 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Kay,
(Any relation to Jay Kay? That's guy's cool)
not exactly :)
:(
Maybe you could just wear a silly hat. That'd be enough.
I meant - something along the lines of -
PoolableObjectFactory<T> {
void activateObject(T obj);
destroyObject(T obj);
T makeObject();
void passivateObject(T obj);
boolean validateObject(T obj);
}
Oh, I misunderstood your request: you mean that you want to use
"generics" in commons-pool.
I wasn't able to find any environment "requirements" for commons-pool,
but I suspect that the developers would like commons-pool to be usable
in pre-1.5 Java environments, where generic classes aren't available.
I have to admit that I'm not a big fan of generics in the first place...
just syntactic sugar that ends up making your code uglier than it would
be with plain-old casting. And, in Java, you don't even get RTTI which
is really too bad :(
If you'd like to use commons-pool as a basis for your own tools, you can
certainly modify the source code to add lots of< and> symbols if you
want. Also, patches are always welcome :)
- -chris
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAkt7H6IACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PD0hACfbGrUuEN4RKCH8o3EJGTaV9sv
eWIAoIqM1pnMmwZcs6Wx1JY9+y1x1pdA
=XQow
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
