Good Morning Erik/Phil

I just encountered a bug in maven-surefire-api factory which went something 
like this
All array references such as double[], float[],int[] gacked the factory loader 

reason:
this is not  a Class that the factory is looking for 

so what i did was for each situation where double[] double_array;

 

ArrayList<Double> double_array_list=new ArrayList();

for (int d=0;d<double.array.length(); d++)

{

  Double double=new Double(double_array[i]);

  double_array_list.add(double);

}

now my surefire factories (those that setup surefire testcases) will properly 
discover the unique class object called double_array_list

If anyone else has discovered this anomaly and has a solution please let me know

 

thanks,
Martin Gainty 
______________________________________________ 
Verzicht und Vertraulichkeitanmerkung/Note de déni et de confidentialité

Diese Nachricht ist vertraulich. Sollten Sie nicht der vorgesehene Empfaenger 
sein, so bitten wir hoeflich um eine Mitteilung. Jede unbefugte Weiterleitung 
oder Fertigung einer Kopie ist unzulaessig. Diese Nachricht dient lediglich dem 
Austausch von Informationen und entfaltet keine rechtliche Bindungswirkung. 
Aufgrund der leichten Manipulierbarkeit von E-Mails koennen wir keine Haftung 
fuer den Inhalt uebernehmen.

Ce message est confidentiel et peut être privilégié. Si vous n'êtes pas le 
destinataire prévu, nous te demandons avec bonté que pour satisfaire informez 
l'expéditeur. N'importe quelle diffusion non autorisée ou la copie de ceci est 
interdite. Ce message sert à l'information seulement et n'aura pas n'importe 
quel effet légalement obligatoire. Étant donné que les email peuvent facilement 
être sujets à la manipulation, nous ne pouvons accepter aucune responsabilité 
pour le contenu fourni.



 

> Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2010 20:50:49 -0400
> From: phil.ste...@gmail.com
> To: user@commons.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [math]How to do standardizing (normalizing)
> 
> On 10/1/10 8:32 AM, VanIngen, Erik (FIPS) wrote:
> > Hi Luc and others,
> >
> > I have written the standardize function by myself (see below, including the 
> > tests). Would it be possible to have this added to Apache Math Commons?
> >
> 
> Thanks for contributing!
> 
> We should take discussion of this new feature to the dev list. It 
> would be great if you could open a JIRA ticket and attach a patch 
> including implementation code.
> 
> We can talk about how to integrate this into [math] in JIRA comments 
> and / or on the dev list. For now, I will just say that the 
> simplest way to add this would be to add a static method called 
> something like "normalize" to org.apache.commons.math.stat.StatUtils.
> 
> See http://commons.apache.org/patches.html for info on how to create 
> patches and attach them to JIRA tickets. Do not hesitate to ask 
> either on dev list or in private emails if you need help getting set up.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Phil
> 
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > /**
> > * The standardise function does not seem to be in Apache math commons.
> > *
> > *
> > * @author Erik van Ingen
> > *
> > */
> > public class Standardize {
> >
> > /**
> > * Standardise the series, so in the end it is having mean of 0 and a 
> > standard deviation of 1.
> > *
> > *
> > * @param series
> > * @return
> > */
> > public static double[] run(double[] series) {
> > DescriptiveStatistics stats = new DescriptiveStatistics();
> >
> > // Add the data from the array
> > for (int i = 0; i< series.length; i++) {
> > stats.addValue(series[i]);
> > }
> >
> > // Compute mean and standard deviation
> > double currentMean = stats.getMean();
> > double currentstandardDeviation = stats.getStandardDeviation();
> >
> > // z = (x- mean)/standardDeviation
> > double[] newSeries = new double[series.length];
> >
> > for (int i = 0; i< series.length; i++) {
> > newSeries[i] = (series[i] - currentMean) / currentstandardDeviation;
> > }
> > return newSeries;
> > }
> >
> > }
> >
> >
> >
> > public class StandardizeTest {
> >
> > /**
> > * Run the test with the values 50 and 100 and assume standardized values 
> > with a dinstance of 0.01
> > */
> > @Test
> > public void testRun1() {
> > double series[] = { 50, 100 };
> > double expectedSeries[] = { -0.7, 0.7 };
> > double[] out = Standardize.run(series);
> > for (int i = 0; i< out.length; i++) {
> > assertEquals(out[i], expectedSeries[i], 0.01);
> > }
> >
> > }
> >
> > /**
> > * Run with 77 random values, assuming that the outcome has a mean of 0 and 
> > a standard deviation of 1.
> > *
> > *
> > *
> > */
> > @Test
> > public void testRun2() {
> > int length = 77;
> > double series[] = new double[length];
> >
> > for (int i = 0; i< length; i++) {
> > series[i] = Math.random();
> > }
> >
> > double standardizedSeries[] = Standardize.run(series);
> >
> > DescriptiveStatistics stats = new DescriptiveStatistics();
> >
> > // Add the data from the array
> > for (int i = 0; i< length; i++) {
> > stats.addValue(standardizedSeries[i]);
> > }
> >
> > double distance = 1E-10;
> > assertEquals(0.0, stats.getMean(), distance);
> > assertEquals(1.0, stats.getStandardDeviation(), distance);
> >
> > }
> >
> > }
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Luc Maisonobe [mailto:luc.maison...@free.fr]
> > Sent: 29 September 2010 18:54
> > To: Commons Users List
> > Subject: Re: [math]How to do standardizing (normalizing)
> >
> >
> > Le 29/09/2010 12:13, VanIngen, Erik (FIPS) a écrit :
> >> Hi Apache Commons Math users
> >>
> >> I am looking for an easy way of standardizing my values a mean 0 and a
> >> standard deviation of 1. What is the best way to do that?
> >>
> >> I have tried this:
> >> DescriptiveStatistics stats = new DescriptiveStatistics();
> >> // adding values
> >> ....
> >> // Compute Mean and StandardDeviation
> >> double mean = stats.getMean();
> >> double std = stats.getStandardDeviation();
> >>
> >> and then standardize each value according z = (x- mean)/std
> >>
> >> But I would like to have just a function of standardize an array
> >> according the parameters mean and std. Is there something like this in
> >> Apache Math Commons?
> >
> > I don't think we have such a function.
> >
> > Luc
> >
> >>
> >> Erik
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@commons.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@commons.apache.org
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@commons.apache.org
> >
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@commons.apache.org
> 
                                          

Reply via email to