Did anything ever happen with this? I would like to have a set of SCXML xsd files that match commons-scxml.
Thanks, Lee On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 10:01 PM, Michael McCarthy <[email protected]> wrote: > I have a need to validate my XML file prior to trying to create an instance > of it. > So, I took the latest schema files provided by w3c and make some tweaks so > that it would accept > syntax supported by Commons SCXML. > > It currently passes validation for XML supported by Commons SCXML, but it may > not be strict enough > and may still pass validation for unsupported elements & syntax. > > I would be happy to post it to this mailing list if there are folks who could > review and perhaps refine it. > <snip/> Cool :-) Please attach it to a new JIRA [1] ticket and I'll take a look within a few days. This will be a good fit for the Commons SCXML extras [2] and we can post it there once ready. -Rahul [1] http://commons.apache.org/scxml/issue-tracking.html [2] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/scxml/branches/J6/extras/ > -Mike > > -----Original Message----- > From: Rahul Akolkar > Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 3:30 PM > To: Commons Users List > Subject: Re: Which XSD file can I use to validate my SCXML before I try to > use it? > > On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 6:15 PM, Michael McCarthy > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I am looking for a way to validate my SCXML document before I try to >> instantiate a state machine from it using Commons SCXML. >> >> I have tried to use various versions of the XSD provided in the W3C >> SCXML spec (including the latest version at: >> http://www.w3.org/TR/scxml/) >> >> but I am finding discrepancies in that schema as compared to what >> Commons SCXML supports. >> >> Could someone please point me to the definitive SCXML XSD profile that I >> should be using to validate Commons SCXML documents? >> > <snip/> > > We don't have such an XSD ATM. It'd be good to have one ofcourse -- an > interesting exercise if someone wants to come up with the XSD for the > subset we support then I imagine it'd be easy to maintain going > forward. > > -Rahul > > > >> >> >> Thank you for any help you can provide. >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
