> -----Original Message----- > From: Mladen Turk [mailto:mt...@apache.org] > Sent: Saturday, March 12, 2011 01:23 > To: user@commons.apache.org > Subject: Re: [runtime] Stability of memory mapped file support > > On 03/12/2011 05:57 AM, Steve Ash wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I am working on something that could benefit from using large memory mapped > > files. I have had bad experiences with the built in support, and the lack > > of deterministic unmapping in the past. I am interested in the support > > offered in Commons Runtime. Is it complete or stable? Any production time? > > > > That's my sandbox project, and I'm currently reviewing the complete > API since it collides/overlaps with Java7 API in some areas. > Also I'll completely drop the Java5 support, so I wouldn't suggest > you base anything on the current sandbox code any time soon. > > Anyhow, it's still in active development, and the original > plan for replacing Daemon and Tomcat Native core functionality still > stands, but since lots changed in JVM area since sandboxed, I > had to rethink of few concepts, especially about using core Unsafe > API which offers much higher JNI performance. > > Ping me back in a month or just watch the SVN activity, and I'll > be able to give you more info then. > Worse case? It might even go to the attic before exiting the sandbox. > Sometimes I find developing inside ASF so frustrating, that I'm not > sure I wish to do that again. It's not the same place I remember it > was a decade ago.
Do you have suggestions for improvements? Gary > > > Regards > -- > ^TM > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@commons.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@commons.apache.org
