Hi Gary, the code looks good from here -- all the tests run, and the new functionality we need the most (JexlEngine.getVariables(Script script) ) seems to work fine. But I realize there may be more to it than that.
A snapshot build would indeed be helpful, if that's not too much work for you. We'd rather not ship our own "special" jexl jar if possible. Thanks, -- Max ________________________________ From: Gary Gregory <[email protected]> To: Commons Users List <[email protected]>; Max Tardiveau <[email protected]> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, November 25, 2011 3:54 PM Subject: Re: [jexl] Build for 2.1? I'm not sure what state the trunk code is in, but I am sure we could push a snapshot build to Maven. Would that help you in the short term until the next release? Gary On Nov 25, 2011, at 18:44, "Max Tardiveau" <[email protected]> wrote: > It looks like 2.0.1 is still the latest version available in e.g. Maven > repositories and the Jexl project page. Are there any plans to make 2.1 > available? We're building it ourselves right now, but it would be nice to > just use a pre-built jar (especially in Maven). > > The reason I'm asking is that we need some new features that were added > recently, namely JexlEngine.getVariables(Script script) and the "x in (1, 2, > 3)" syntax. > > Thanks, > > -- Max
