On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Karsten Wutzke <kwut...@web.de> wrote:
> Wow, the Java/JDK is getting dirtier and dirtier with every release. The code
>
> public Foo(Bar bar) {
> this.bar = Objects.requireNonNull(bar);
> }
> looks really really awful to me.
As opposed to this.bar = Validate.notNull(bar) from commons-lang3? ;)
Matt
>
> IMO it's time to reimplement the JDK and throw away backward compatibility
> than introduce patch after patch. At least a second clean API of the JDK
> should be provided.
>
> I wonder what others are thinking about this.
>
> Karsten
>
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: "Paul Benedict" <pbened...@apache.org>
> Gesendet: 21.12.2011 19:04:48
> An: "Commons Users List" <user@commons.apache.org>
> Betreff: Re: commons lang3: NullArgumentException missing?
>
>>The official standard in the JDK is to throw NPE for null arguments. Since
>>JDK 7, they have made API available for this in
>>java.util.Objects#requireNonNull(). Commons is following the official
>>direction.
>>On Dec 21, 2011 10:16 AM, <kwut...@web.de> wrote:
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________
> SMS schreiben mit WEB.DE FreeMail - einfach, schnell und
> kostenguenstig. Jetzt gleich testen! http://f.web.de/?mc=021192
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@commons.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@commons.apache.org
