On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 10:02:29PM +0000, Italo Maia wrote: > > Oh my. Fair enough. Here is a sample data. > > http://pastebin.com/MkQrE8d2
See below. > > The values of a, b and c for this sample data, for best fitting, are: > A: 1.0782 B: 0.4583 C: 0.0166 > > When everything is working, I'll publish something about the code. > CurveFitter seems very devoided of love. > > > Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2012 23:52:31 +0200 > > From: [email protected] > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [math] > > > > Hello. > > > > On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 09:19:17PM +0000, Italo Maia wrote: > > > > > > Here you go: http://pastebin.com/UR0GV7ST > > > > > > > I'd think that it would be better not to use such a site, since it seems > > that the contents will be removed at some point, leading to this thread > > being impossible to follow in the archive. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Here. > > [Maybe other people on the ML could give their opinion on this aspect.] > > > > The subject of this thread is not very clear either. :-} > > > > > > > > Unfortunatly I can't provide the matrix data. : / > > > > So, how am I supposed to know what is going on? > > Clearly if you define the "gradient" method as on the above page, it cannot > > work. > > > > Please provide, in an attached file, a working example, showing what you > > tried and what result you obtained. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ And here. Thanks, Gilles --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
