*- what is slowly versus faster in terms of your application?*

 I mean using slowly; my application is a graphical simulation application
and running at 60 fps but when I called this application from my java code
it is running about 40 fps.

*- does your application create a lot of output on stdout?*
Yes, my java application and called application(Application.exe) are
creating too much stdout.
I think you pointed out right location. There are too much stdout producing.

Sincerely,
Emin


On 12 June 2013 00:51, Siegfried Goeschl <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Mehmet,
>
> a few questions
>
> * what is slowly versus faster in terms of your application?
> * does your application create a lot of output on stdout?
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> Siegfried Goeschl
>
>
> On 11.06.13 20:54, Mehmet Emin PAÇA wrote:
>
>> Hi, I am running an exe file using commons-exec 1.1 version.But there are
>> performance problems occuring.
>> I mean when I compared running performances using cmd.exe  vs running from
>> a java application(using commons-exec), the application which called in
>> common-exec  is working slowly. But the other application run from cmd.exe
>> is working faster.
>>
>> What can be problem ?
>>
>> Running exe file from my simple java application code is below:
>>
>>              *CommandLine cmdlLine = CommandLine.parse("**
>> Application.exe");
>>
>>              watchDog = new
>> ExecuteWatchdog(**ExecuteWatchdog.INFINITE_**TIMEOUT);
>>              DefaultExecuteResultHandler resultHandler = new
>> DefaultExecuteResultHandler();
>>              Executor executor = new DefaultExecutor();
>>              executor.setExitValue(0);
>>              executor.setWatchdog(watchDog)**;
>>              executor.execute(cmdlLine,**resultHandler);*
>>
>>
>> Running from cmd.exe:
>>
>> *            C:\Users\test.user > Application.exe *
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
> ------------------------------**------------------------------**---------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
> user-unsubscribe@commons.**apache.org<[email protected]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>

Reply via email to