Hi Rinke, Welcome! And that's great to hear about your project! The roadmap is described here: http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-scxml/roadmap.htmlI would recommend you to use 2.0-M1 instead because the milestones (M0 and M1) were actually done based on the J6 branch and included proper cleanups and basic alignments to the latest specification.
Kind regards, Woonsan [1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/commons-dev/201404.mbox/%3c533d4314.40...@douma.nu%3E On Tuesday, April 15, 2014 5:30 AM, R.C. Hoekstra <r.c.hoeks...@erasmusmc.nl> wrote: Hi all @ commons scxml, > >We're a university team of scientists working on multi agent simulations of >tropical diseases for a world health organization project. A disease can be >considered as a state machine, with the patient going through various states >and transitions, each triggering new events. > >For our project we're diving into commons scxml. However I'm a bit confused >about what version would be best to use. I'm a bit afraid that the 0.9 >official release is so much outdated that it will not be compatible with the >coming release, so we would end up with lots of changes to be made when >updating. On the other hand working on a release which is still under >development or unstable doesn't seem a good idea. > >Is the J6 branch on the svn.apache.org repository a good idea (1.0)? > >Can you give some clues in when the first 2.0 release can be expected? > >Thanks, Rinke > >by the way: thanks for all the good work done. I think it is a great project. > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@commons.apache.org > > >
