Not an answer, but why would they make it so it wasn't backwards compatible, 
and whydid they not include other parts that were a part of 3?  Is 4 in 
beta/alpha or what?  I would think everything would flow nicely...?

> Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 16:42:06 +0200
> Subject: Re: [beanutils] Version 1.9.2 uses FastHashMap in class 
> PropertyUtilsBean, but FastHashMap does not exists in collections4
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> 
> Hi Florian,
> 
> beanutils 1.9 still requires a collections 3.x jar in your classpath, it
> has not yet been updated for the latest collections release.
> 
> Collections 4.0 is not binary / source compatible with collections 3.x but
> can be used together as it uses a different package name
> (o.a.c.collections4) and maven coordinates.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Thomas
> 
> 
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 4:32 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> >
> > Hi All
> >
> > We have tried to update our common libs. We have updated to
> > Beanutils 1.9.2 and collection4 4.0.
> > These packages are incompatible, or did i get something wrong.
> >
> > I always receive this error
> > Stacktrace]
> > java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
> > org/apache/commons/collections/FastHashMap
> >         at
> > org.apache.commons.beanutils.PropertyUtilsBean.getMappedPropertyDescriptors
> > (PropertyUtilsBean.java:723)
> >         at
> > org.apache.commons.beanutils.PropertyUtilsBean.getMappedPropertyDescriptors
> > (PropertyUtilsBean.java:743)
> >         at
> > org.apache.commons.beanutils.PropertyUtilsBean.getPropertyDescriptor
> > (PropertyUtilsBean.java:956)
> >         at
> > org.apache.commons.beanutils.PropertyUtilsBean.isWriteable
> > (PropertyUtilsBean.java:1466)
> >         at
> > org.apache.commons.beanutils.BeanUtilsBean.copyProperties
> > (BeanUtilsBean.java:277)
> >         at org.apache.commons.beanutils.BeanUtils.copyProperties
> > (BeanUtils.java:135)
> >
> > Greetings
> > Florian
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >
> >
                                          

Reply via email to