Hi Henri, I attached a simple Main class to : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JEXL-186 and the results.
Regards Philippe On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 8:19 PM, henrib <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi; > Since performance is the same with the workaround, we've got > another/different performance issue. Is there any easy way to replicate > your > test - or at least its essence - ? What does your benchmark do ? What are > the evaluated expressions / scripts ? > > Back too your note: the 'size' method is discovered through introspection > as > an overload of the 'size' operator; this creates an entry in a cache for > that arithmetic class avoiding to re-discover the operator overloads > (Uberspect) on each execution. So, no, this method is not called; it is > just > meant as a workaround of the bug. > > Regards > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-commons.680414.n4.nabble.com/JEXL3-Performance-degradation-compared-to-2-1-1-tp4682086p4682115.html > Sent from the Commons - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > -- Cordialement. Philippe Mouawad.
