Oliver Heger wrote: > > > > Am 29.04.2016 um 20:36 schrieb Jörg Schaible: >> c...@honton.org wrote: >> >>> Jorge, >>> >>> You could create a different named method for each primitive array >>> type. Would be a pain to use in a generic fashion. >> >> >> [snip] >> >> I agree with a method returning explicitly an array, but that has been >> nonsense in first place. >> >> As I already pointed out, the existing >> >> <T> T get(Class<T> cls, String key); >> >> would have been completely enough. See my examples from the last mail. > > IIRC get() currently cannot handle arrays, but this should be easy to > add. So could you please open a Jira ticket to track this?
Done: CONFIGURATION-626 Cheers, Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@commons.apache.org
