I was unaware 3.12.0 was out, my apologies.
Yes, 3.12.0 is much better. In the last 5 mins, I have tested both
versions. 10 trials with 3.12.0, 10 successful conversations. With
3.11.1, 10 trials, 8 of which ended with the same exception that I posted.
So, yes, only anecdotal evidence, but that which does suggest that
3.12.0 would work going forward where 3.11.1 would not.
So, you must have increased the expected IMAP reply string length in
3.12.0? Thank you!
Stuart
On 12/12/25 11:57, Gary Gregory wrote:
Hello Stuart,
When happens with 3.12.0?
Thank you,tion
Gary
On Fri, Dec 12, 2025 at 2:50 PM Stuart Maclean <[email protected]> wrote:
I am using Commons Net 3.11.1.
I am contacting a Microsoft Email server via IMAP. Sometimes, its
initial reply is unexpectedly long, and the IMAPReply class barfs:
org.apache.commons.net.MalformedServerReplyException: Received
unexpected IMAP protocol response from server: '* OK The Microsoft
Exchange IMAP4 service is ready. (BACKENDAUTHENTICATE)
[TQBXADQAUABSADAANABDAEEAMAAyADMAOAAuAG4AYQBtAHAAcgBkADAANAAuAHAAcgBvAGQALgBvAHUAdABsAG8AbwBrAC4AYwBvAG0A]'.
at
org.apache.commons.net.imap.IMAPReply.getReplyCode(IMAPReply.java:119)
at
org.apache.commons.net.imap.IMAPReply.getUntaggedReplyCode(IMAPReply.java:130)
at org.apache.commons.net.imap.IMAP.getReply(IMAP.java:288)
at org.apache.commons.net.imap.IMAP._connectAction_(IMAP.java:152)
I have brought this up before. Perhaps this time it might get at least
an ack? Thanks.
Stuart
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
