On 28 Dec 2008, at 14:32, Antony Blakey wrote:
On 28/12/2008, at 11:56 PM, Paul Davis wrote:
Why "id" and "rev" are used instead of "_id" and
"_rev" I couldn't really tell you. I hate to say "historical reasons"
but I'm guessing that when Damien designed the view output he just
labeled then "id" and "rev" without the underscore because it's not
needed to distinguish from the rest of the doc.
Desirable to change that (and any other inconsistencies) before a 1.0
This keeps coming up and I've been advocating this for a while now:
+1 for changing view result rows `rev` to `_rev` to avoid confusion.
CC'ing [email protected].
Cheers
Jan
--
